State Statutes That Protect Judicial Corruption

RIGHT TO REFORM

The Constitution of the United States, Article IV, Section 2 states: " The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.


Many of our state constitutions include the same or similar clause in our state bill of rights as follows:  "That all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness; for the advancement of those ends they have at all times, an unalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper."  The below unconstitutional state statues and corrupt conduct of state officials demonstrate a clear need of reform.  We are going to assert our right and DEMAND REFORM and end Judicial Corruption.  We are not asking!


“it is a general and indisputable rule, that where there is a legal

right, there is also a legal remedy by suit, or action at law,…" Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137, 2 L. Ed. 60, 2 – Sup. Ct. 1803 (at 163)


TENNESSEE - Actus repugnans non potest in esse produci


The Constitution of The State of Tennessee Art X Section 2 includes the oath of office for state legislators:   "I______ do solemnly swear (or affirm) ... that I will not propose or assent to any bill, vote or resolution, which shall appear to me injurious to the people, or consent to any act or thing, whatever, that shall have a tendency to lessen or abridge their rights and privileges, as declared by the Constitution of this state."  It is alleged, that legislators who enacted the following statutes are "Oath Breakers"


Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-104  (2017)

(a) (1) Except as provided in subdivision (a)(2), the following actions shall be commenced within one (1) year after the cause of action accrued:

       (A) Actions for libel, injuries to the person, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, or breach of marriage promise;

   (B) Civil actions for compensatory or punitive damages, or both, brought under the federal civil rights statutes;

(c) (1) Actions and suits against licensed public accountants, certified public accountants, or attorneys for malpractice shall be commenced within one (1) year after the cause of action accrued, whether the action or suit is grounded or based in contract or tort.


EXPLANATION:  (1) The state cannot lesson or abridge a right to bring a cause of action for false imprisonment, malicious prosecution with a one-year statute of limitation (SOL).  (2) The state does not have authority to set SOL on federal civil rights statutes. (3) The state cannot grant special privilege (one-year SOL) to CPAs  and Attorneys.  Why don't doctors have same SOL?  Obviously, the legal profession wants to preserve revenue streams from medical malpractice suits while granting themselves special immunity from malpractice suits. 


 Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-20-205  (2017) 

  Immunity from suit of all governmental entities is removed for injury proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of any employee within the scope of his employment except if the injury arises out of:

(1) The exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function, whether or not the discretion is abused;

   (2) False imprisonment pursuant to a mittimus from a court, false arrest, malicious prosecution, intentional trespass, abuse of process, libel, slander, deceit, interference with contract rights, infliction of mental anguish, invasion of right of privacy, or civil rights;

EXPLANATION:  This statute is absolutely REPUGNANT to our federal constitution.   This state statute provides immunity for heinous crimes, rights violations, and the aiding and abetting of heinous crimes and rights violations.  This statute is prima facie evidence that state officials (corrupt judges, AKA, corrupt attorneys wearing black robes) perpetrate crimes under color of law, and seek to protect their criminal conduct through unconstitutional state statute.  Governmental Entities do not commit these crimes.  These crimes are perpetrated by bad actor state officials and the state provides unconstitutional immunity for bad actors.