There is little doubt the rhetoric used in the below posts include an impassioned call to action. Phrases such as "FIGHT WITH ME" are NOT A CALL to take up firearms or engage in violent protest.
We are a civilized society and TOGETHER we can effect meaningful and lasting reform through the peaceful means of demanding reform through a REFORM LAWSUIT filed into our highest court - The Supreme Court of the United States. An EXTRAORDINARY WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS.
It is true that the POWER OF THE PEN is mightier than the sword, and past reforms in our country have always been best achieved through peaceful means. Our founding fathers foresaw the eventuality of our present circumstance and wrote into our state constitutions that POWER IS INHERENT THE PEOPLE and AT ALL TIMES, we have an UNALIENABLE and INDEFEASIBLE RIGHT TO REFORM OUR GOVERNMENT IN SUCH MANNER AS WE THINK PROPER. Certainly everyone can agree a REFORM LAWSUIT is a reasonable means to DEMAND REFORM.
The "Call to Arms" herein sought, is merely a call to spread the word..., join others to our cause, and as a people, united in common purpose, peacefully DEMAND REFORM of our corrupted and broken legal system.
rhetoric - literary uses of language, including the figures of speech.
CRIMINAL JUDGES AS JURY OF ONE DECIDING THEIR OWN CRIMINALITY
Here is a little dose of common sense showing you how ridiculous our legal system is.
A common problem in our courts today is judicial bias. Also known as corrupt attorneys in black robes (aka judges) conspiring with attorneys to deny due process, and extort under color of law.
A litigant who is being subjected to a biased court can file a Motion To Disqualify to have the judge removed from the case. In Tennessee state courts this is filed pursuant to Tenn. Sup. Ct. Rule 10B, and in federal courts pursuant to 28 U.S.Code § 455. Pursuant to Rule 10B, a represented party cannot file a motion to disqualify themselves, and it has to be filed by their attorney. But attorneys will never allege bias against a judge they have to stand before.
And of course, judges never recuse or disqualify when they are accused of bias.
Think! The ridiculous disqualification process is trickery, deception, and a confidence scheme.
A judge who is biased in a case is conspiring with the attorneys to deny due process. Due process requires an impartial judge. Therefore, denial of an impartial judge, and being subjected to a biased judge is a denial of due process.
Bias takes many forms; unlawful orders, ignoring perjury, relying on obvious perjury as basis of their decisions, using unsupported allegations as basis of their decisions, wrongfully excluding evidence, denying the right to be heard, case steering, and on and on and on… These practices are unfortunately all too common in our courts today.
The injury or oppression of constitutionally protected rights, including oppression of a right of due process is a federal crime with a penalty of incarceration and/or fine, as defined in federal statute;
18 U.S. Code § 241
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person… in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, … They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
So when you ask a judge to disqualify based on bias, you are either accusing them of a federal crime, or you are expressing concern that there is an appearance of a federal crime in progress.
Here’s the scam – guess who hears the motion to disqualify? Yep, you guessed it… the judge who hears the motion is the very judge you are accusing of a crime. Wow! So now you have a person accused of a crime, acting as a jury of one, deciding their own innocence. And again, when bias is alleged, corrupt attorneys in black robes pretending to be judges never disqualify.
We need to stop this scam. We need a state statute requiring that whenever a motion to disqualify is filed, the judge must disqualify. If the judge refuses to disqualify, the motion to disqualify must be heard by a jury. We cannot continue to have criminal judges as a jury of one deciding their own guilt or innocence.
In the meantime, until we can correct this problem with proper legislation, if you are subjected to a corrupt and/or biased judge, go ahead and file a motion to disqualify. But along with that motion, file a Jury Demand & Written Stipulation pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. Rule 38.01, 38.02, and 39.01.
As state senator, when elected, I will continue to fight to preserve your rights and restore justice and equality for all.
MAKING HISTORY - RESTORING RIGHTS - REFORMING GOVT
The link just below, is a link to my Petition of Remonstrance filed with both the Tennessee House of Representatives and Senate.
The right to petition by address or remonstrance is a constitutional right that the people have forgotten or have been deceived into forgetting. Tenn. Const. Art. I, Sect 23.
This Petition of Remonstrance is the first "Petition" filed in the general assembly since the year 1850, and the first "Petition of Remonstrance" ever filed in the entire history of the State of Tennessee.
This legal document demands; (1) reform of our broken and all too often corrupted judiciary, (2) abolishment of unconstitutional agencies that protect corruption like the Tennessee Bd of Judicial Conduct that dismisses 100% of complaints filed by the public, (3) impeachment of several bad actor judges who committed crimes and violated rights, (4) repealing of state statutes that protect corruption, and (5) new reforms to safeguard the blessings of liberty and justice for all including; statutory requirement of advising litigants of their rights, live stream and recorded court proceedings available to the public on demand, drug tests for judges, and more.
Initially, the general assembly played ignorant. Director of Legislation Holt Whitt stated to me, "We are not telling you no..., we don't know what to do." And so, we the people have been ignored since January.
Further defending our rights, I filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in Davidson Cty, Chancery Court asking the court to order the speakers and clerks of both houses to do their jobs and hear and decide my remonstrance.
Their answer? Further oppression of a constitutionally protected right (which is a federal crime) by filing a Motion to Dismiss that included falsified and counterfeit evidence.
I will continue to fight to restore our rights and restore the voice of the people.
As state senator, when elected, I will be even more effective. I ask you to stand with me. Stand with me in defense of the constitution. Stand with me in defense of justice. Stand with me in defending constitutionally protected rights. Alone in the struggle, I expect to prevail. Together, we will prevail, and a great healing of our nation will commence.
John A Gentry, CPA
Candidate State Senate, District 18 -Sumner County, Trousdale County, and Davidson County east of state hwy 45 (Old Hickory Blvd).
A SOCIETY OVERRUN BY NEW LEGISLATION
Here is another dose of common sense. How much new legislation do we possibly need?
The last sentence of each bill reads “…the public welfare requiring it.” So considering the public acts of the last annual congressional session, apparently the “public welfare” requires lots and lots of new statutory law, each and every year… Or do we?
As a CPA, I like to run the numbers, perform statistical analysis, and extrapolate trends (draw conclusions based on the data). So, lets run the numbers…
During the last session of the Tennessee general assembly, there were 513 pieces of enacted legislation, i.e. bills that were passed.
House Rules of Order 44 (d)(1), No member may file more than fifteen (15) bills during each annual session of a General Assembly, except that a chair of a standing committee may file an additional five (5) bills on subjects that pertain to the committee on which he or she chairs.
There are 99 representatives, and 99 X 15 = 1,485 bills. Since the committee chairs are permitted another 5 and there are 14 committees, that’s another 70 bills for a grand total of 1,555 bills each annual session. There are another 29 subcommittees but I’m not sure if those chairs are also permitted to file an extra 5 bills. If so, that would be another 145 bills. Each bill must have a companion bill in the senate, so an equal number are generated by the senate.
Since most members of the house max out on bills they submit, that means our general assembly considers about 1,500 bills each and every session. Wow! And about 1/3 pass.
If you don’t believe me, the following link is a link to the “COMPILATION OF ABSTRACTS AND SELECTED SUMMARIES OF LEGISLATION PASSED BY THE 111TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2019” listing all the statutes passed this year
As summarized on pages 12 to 60, there were 513 enactments of new legislation. To be fair, 65 of the 513 enacted legislation are “Sunset Laws” that extend various agencies and commissions like the standards committee, department of human services, and the unconstitutional Board of Judicial Conduct, as well as a few other "odds and ends".
I’m pretty sure the public welfare does not require this much statutory law. Most of what is enacted pertains to special interest groups, tweaking the “law” to their favor.
Case in point, take a look at this video of my testimony in house subcommittee. https://youtu.be/11GKWshcvI0 The legislation I was testifying against, was not only wholly unnecessary, it ignored the fact that attorneys and judges completely ignore and violate their own ethical rules. The bill I testified against in this video was not about “public welfare”. This bill was about granting yet more discretion to attorneys in black robes (aka judges), and allows them to bypass rules requiring attorneys be held financially responsible for frivolous lawsuits. Effectively, this bill enables extortion under color of law. Color of law means the appearance of a legal act but actually unlawful.
From our Declaration of Independence; “He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of ‘pretended Legislation’”
As state senator, when elected, I have no interest in creating more legislation that benefits the few or that harms the public. I will be working to repeal unconstitutional legislation as well as to put in place new safeguards to secure the blessings of liberty and justice for all.
IMPORTANT CRITICAL READ - PLAN OF ACTION - CALL TO DUTY
This ANNOUNCEMENT is a call to arms of sorts, a call to PERFORM your CIVIC DUTY. A plea to take a stand and fight with me. FIGHT WITH ME!!!
Fight with me, and I give my SOLEMN OATH to stand next to you as a fierce warrior - I will not surrender this battle. FIGHT WITH ME and DEMAND PEACEFUL REFORM of our broken legal system!!!
Recently a viewer posted a simple comment during a live stream show I was on - "Abraham Lincoln". No other words or explanation..., just the name of our Sixteenth President. I was reminded of the most profound words ever spoken by one of leaders.
The Gettysburg Address conclusion:
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. IT IS FOR US THE LIVING, rather, TO BE DEDICATED HERE TO THE UNFINISHED WORK which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. IT IS RATHER FOR US TO BE HERE DEDICATED TO THE GREAT TASK REMAINING BEFORE US -- THAT FROM THESE HONORED DEAD WE TAKE INCREASED DEVOTION TO THAT CAUSE FOR WHICH THEY GAVE THE LAST FULL MEASURE OF DEVOTION -- THAT WE HERE HIGHLY RESOLVE THAT THESE DEAD SHALL NOT HAVE DIED IN VAIN -- THAT THIS NATION, UNDER GOD, SHALL HAVE A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM -- AND THAT GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE, SHALL NOT PERISH FROM THE EARTH.
These words by our Sixteenth President perfectly express why I am in this fight. That those men (and all patriots - men and women) did not die or sacrifice in vain. That this Nation shall have a NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM. For if we fail in this fight before us today, we will have failed them, and surely they will have died or sacrificed in vain. Not only will we have failed them - WE THE PEOPLE, will have failed ourselves. I WILL NOT ACCEPT THAT OUTCOME. I WILL NOT!!! FIGHT WITH ME!!!
In the words of Lincoln, "... THAT FROM THESE HONORED DEAD WE TAKE INCREASED DEVOTION... This is what I ask of you today - your INCREASED DEVOTION.
To come here into this group and state "I'm In" and to do nothing more is not good enough. Each person must take INCREASED DEVOTION to further this cause. Several persons here involved in this group have heard my call and have worked hard to join others to our cause. Many have not as evidenced on the attached listing of membership. In the group admin section, FB tells me that less than 1/2 the membership are "active members". "Active Members" are those who "like" posts or those who comment on posts. This means that half of our members probably have not come into the group to see what we are about - WHICH IS NOTHING LESS THAN PRESENTING OUR HIGHEST COURT WITH THE MOST IMPORTANT CASE EVER HEARD.
The left table of the attached, shows the count of members invited by each person. The right table alphabetically lists each member and who they invited. Cross reference the people you invited as listed on right table and see if the persons you invited has invited others. As an example, and not to single anyone out, and only because it is the first name on the list, xxx invited two people to the group. Those two people have not invited anyone else because their names are not listed on the left table. If you have invites like that - REACH OUT TO THEM. Message them and ask them if they know they were invited. Ask them if they visited the group. Ask them to do their part and further our cause.
Set aside 15 minutes each day and use that time to reach out to the people you invited and ask them if they are excited about this project. Use that time to reach out to new people and invite them. Use that time to go out to other groups and tell them about this project.
FIGHT WITH ME!!!
I sincerely recognize that many here in this group have suffered greatly. I recognize this suffering affects our ability to organize our thoughts, and our ability to perform normal daily tasks. I know this pain too, but surely not as intimately as many of you here assembled. I know many of you are wounded warriors who have already fought long and hard in a seemingly futile battle. If you are one of our wounded warriors who has long been in this fight, I humbly ask you to once again stand up and fight with me. I swear a solemn oath to stand by you as a fierce warrior.
PLAN OF ATTACK - MOVING FORWARD
Next month, I am going to set up a new registered domain and website. We will start moving names of people in this group to that site and gathering email addresses. Under that new domain name/address, I will ask you to email me your FB name and email address. In this way, we can keep track of who in this group is actively participating and providing their email contact info. I will ask for volunteers to help me manage the data and contact those not providing data.
I am also going to set up a constant contact account from which I will send out mass emails to the members of this group since many do not receive group notifications.
Once we have enough people, and we are ready to file in SCOTUS, which is about 300,000 active members, I will reach out to EVERYONE via email and ANNOUNCEMENT here, and send you an affidavit affirming you are a real person, a co-petitioner, your full legal name, home address, and phone number. These affidavits will have to be notarized and an image sent to me so I can file with SCOTUS. I'm still working on details regarding this with the Clerk's Office so this may change. I hope to find out more this week.
And then TOGETHER we will file the MOST IMPORTANT CASE EVER FILED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
God Bless you if you took the time to read this far. If you did, leave a comment "I'm standing next to you" so I'll know who is committed.
With all my heart - THANK YOU!!!
DEMAND FOR UNITY
Since at least the 1960's our courts have steadfastly become more and more corrupt, and if history predicts the future, our courts will become even more corrupt (if that is even imaginable). The time is now to UNITE in COMMON PURPOSE.
In this group I need not list out the travesties, you well know the crimes of corrupt attorneys in black robes colluding with attorneys, CPS, and various other state bad actors.
We all can agree THIS MUST STOP!!!
This project here - WE THE PEOPLE v THE FIFTY UNITED STATES is not my idea. The idea for this project is attributed to the brilliance of our FOUNDING FATHERS who established this REPUBLIC and our form of government that is: OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE and FOR THE PEOPLE. It is to them, to whom credit for this project is properly attributed.
I have tagged everyone who was named as a "leader" in this movement on this post. I respectfully ask that we unite in common purpose under this banner "WE THE PEOPLE" and DEMAND REFORM of our broken and corrupt legal system. I ask that you use your influence to reach out to EVERYONE and invite them to stand side by side with us.
This project serves the purpose of improving..., if not solving, the problems of whatever cause you support. If you do not understand this project, please call me and allow me to explain how this project will be successful and will dramatically fix many of the problems you fight to fix. My cell phone number is 615-351-2649. That goes for anyone, if you do not understand what this project is about, if you don't understand that we will be SUCCESSFUL no matter what, call me.
In an EFFORT TO UNITE, if you like, I will appoint you as a moderator on this page for a week and you can make one post to present the effort you are engaged in to this audience. On our website, I also have a marketing platform and I invite you prepare an email that I will email out to everyone in our database. I will also add a page to the website, OTHER RESOURCES and include a link to your website, FB page with a brief description of your cause.
WHAT SAY YOU?
FIGHT WITH ME. FIGHT TOGETHER!!!
QUESTION FOR GROUP
Is the reform movement being taken down another rabbit hole?
Throughout history, the legal profession has often faced times like these where the dissatisfaction with the judicial and legal system reaches a boiling point. "Their" answer through out history is to pacify WE THE PEOPLE with legislation, study committees, etc., etc.
DO NOT BE FOOLED. These corrupt lawyers wearing robes (costumes) and their BAR buddies have no interest in REFORM. Their interest is to pacify us so they can continue to conduct their corrupt proceedings.
Think about it... In the late 1970s Congress enacted 42 USC, Section 1983 supposedly to protect us from lawyers and judges in collusion. Did that help? Of course not. The leaders of the reform movement of that time were pacified into thinking they had effected great change. Has Section 1983 been enforced against lawyers and judges? Of course not.
These CORRUPT LAWYERS WEARING ROBES and their BAR BUDDIES are CONFIDENCE MEN.
Confidence men are not "crooks" in the ordinary sense of the word. They are suave, slick and capable. Their depredations are very much on the genteel side. Because of their high intelligence, their solid organization, the widespread convenience of the law, and the fact that the victim [sometimes] must admit criminal intentions if he wishes to prosecute, society has been neither willing nor able to avenge itself affectively. Scamming: The Misunderstood Confidence Man, Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities Vol. 27: Iss. 2, Art. 2)”
WE THE PEOPLE, here assembled will not be fooled, we will not be taken down another rabbit hole. Do you really think 50/50 shared parenting will make a difference? Section 1983 did not make a difference, why should 50/50 parenting make a difference? How easy will it be for these corrupt "legal professionals" to rely on false allegations of drug use, abuse, mental unfitness, etc. and award custody to one parent and just keep right on trucking with their vexatious litigation?
This is not to say 50/50 is a complete waste of time. Likely some parents will be saved - and even if only a few can be saved that is a win. And of course we need to take every win we can.
But we cannot let ourselves be pacified. The real problem is no oversight and no accountability of crooked lawyers and crooked lawyers in black robes. That is what WE THE PEOPLE, here assembled, are about... ACCOUNTABILITY and a return of POWER to WE THE PEOPLE.
FIGHT WITH ME!!!
SCOTUS SHOULD BE FINED
The EPA or some federal agency should fine the Supreme Court of the United States for fraud, waste and abuse.
Sup Ct Rule 33.1 requires petitions be filed on 60lb cardstock paper. Cardstock is what business cards are made from, three times as thick as copy paper, three times as much paper, three times as many trees, three times the environmental footprint... where are the tree huggers????
Then they require Writs printed double sided in book form measuring 6 1/8" X 9 1/4" which means you have to make two cuts which is why there is all that waste (see below). Shameful? Do you think this stupid rule was put in place just to make it hard to get docketed? I do! Can you say "DENIAL OF ACCESS TO COURT"? I started at 6AM this morning printing and cutting... I just finished at 8:30PM. Fourteen hours just to print and cut? I still have to bind and that will take another couple hours.
No worries, we will jump through their stupid hoops.
The below Writs, I'm filing this week in my own reform case against TN. It is similar to what we will file TOGETHER.
With this case I'm stacking the deck in our favor. They are so arrogant and confident in themselves, they are clueless to the "chess game" I'm playing. However they decide this case..., grant review, don't grant review... rule in my favor, decide against me... is win win for us. Can't elaborate on that just yet due to OPSEC.
This case I'm filing has three defendants and Sup Ct Rules require I provide them 3 copies each. Soooo, 40 copies for SCOTUS, 9 copies for defendants, 1 copy regular copy paper so Clerk's Office can scan it. It was a labor of love.
I bet opposing counsel cringes when they see what I have written. As Sui Juris, I can speak the truth where attorneys cannot lest they offend their brethren. I am not bound to the rules of their fraternity. I can speak truth so long as I do so in a respectful manner and with the truth supported by evidence.
This case was a good warm up for our case... 219 pages including appendixes.
Copyright © 2019 WETHEPEOPLEv50STATES - All Rights Reserved.